| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
a |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20211222160741.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
211222b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Original cataloging agency |
AIKTC-KRRC |
| Transcribing agency |
AIKTC-KRRC |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| 9 (RLIN) |
14985 |
| Author |
Bapat, Hirakraj |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators of Integrated Project Delivery and BIM Model for Infrastructure Transportation Project in Ahmedabad, India through Decision-Making Approach |
| 250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT |
|---|
| Volume, Issue number |
Vol, 102(4), December |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. |
USA |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. |
Springer |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Pagination |
995-1011p. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) are widely adopted by the Architecture Engineering and Construction industry because of its distinguished benefits to the complex infrastructure projects throughout the project life cycle. This paper aims at evaluating Key Performance Indicators (KPI) of Integrated Project Delivery and Building Information Modeling for an infrastructure project like a metro-rail construction project in Ahmedabad, a city in western India, through decision-making tools like Factor Comparison Method (FCM) and fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL). After an extensive literature review and experts’ opinions, a list of 24 Key Performance Indicators were generated. FCM and fuzzy DEMATEL were applied for prioritizing and evaluating the identified KPIs and disclosing their interrelationships based on influential weight. The findings revealed that 16 most critical key performance indicators are vital for BIM and IPD adoption in highly complex infrastructure projects with visualizing their interrelationship by causal diagram showing cause-and-effects groups. The results showed the four most influential and critical KPIs as accessibility and accuracy of information by BIM, facilitating access to real-time data, interoperability and compatibility of data, minimizing claims and disputes which should be given more consideration for enhanced performance and successful completion of the complex infrastructure projects in the future. |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| 9 (RLIN) |
4621 |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Civil Engineering |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| 9 (RLIN) |
9632 |
| Co-Author |
Sarkar, Debasis |
| 773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Title |
Journal of the institution of engineers (India): Series A |
| International Standard Serial Number |
2250-2149 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication |
Switzerland Springer |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
|---|
| URL |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40030-021-00568-3 |
| Link text |
Click here |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
|
| Koha item type |
Articles Abstract Database |
