Performance evaluation of infill materials of geocell-reinforced granular bed overlying soft subgrade (Record no. 19808)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field a
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20230825105608.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 230825b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency AIKTC-KRRC
Transcribing agency AIKTC-KRRC
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
9 (RLIN) 21626
Author Biswas, Sudeep
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Performance evaluation of infill materials of geocell-reinforced granular bed overlying soft subgrade
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT
Volume, Issue number Vol.53(3), Jun
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. USA
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Springer
Year 2023
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Pagination 651-664p.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. This paper evaluates the performance of various infill materials of geocell-reinforced granular beds through a model plate load test. Tests were performed on two different types of geocell, i.e., commercial geocell (CG)- and three-dimensional geogrid (TDG)-reinforced bed overlying soft subgrade. Three types of infill materials were used in this study, i.e., sand, crushed aggregate (CA), and recycled asphalt pavement (RAP). However, three different mixes of the CA were prepared based on maximum particle size, i.e., 10 mm (CA 10), 25 mm (CA 25), and 40 mm (CA 40), respectively. Further, the performance of infill materials was investigated on geocell with an additional basal mat of woven geotextile (WGT) and planar geogrid (PG). It was observed that the RAP-filled base layers fail at a higher footing settlement of 18–20% (s/B) than infill materials sand and CA, i.e., 6–12% (s/B). The maximum bearing capacity was observed as 455 kPa for CG with infill material CA25 and 556 kPa for TDG with infill material CA40. The performance of the CG improved 1.15–1.4 times with the inclusion of the basal WGT. However, with basal PG, the performance of TDG increased 1.5–1.9 times. Despite the higher tensile strength and flexural stiffness of the geogrid, the performance of the CG was better than the TDG with sand and CA10 as infill materials because of the higher confinement effect. The basal mat’s performance depends not only on its tensile strength but also on its flexural stiffness.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
9 (RLIN) 4621
Topical term or geographic name entry element Civil Engineering
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
9 (RLIN) 21627
Co-Author Monowar Hussain
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
International Standard Serial Number 0971-9555
Title Indian geotechnical journal
Place, publisher, and date of publication Switzerland Springer
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40098-022-00695-z
Link text Click here
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Koha item type Articles Abstract Database
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Shelving location Date acquired Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
          School of Engineering & Technology (PG) School of Engineering & Technology (PG) Archieval Section 2023-08-25 2023-1246 2023-08-25 2023-08-25 Articles Abstract Database
Unique Visitors hit counter Total Page Views free counter
Implemented and Maintained by AIKTC-KRRC (Central Library).
For any Suggestions/Query Contact to library or Email: librarian@aiktc.ac.in | Ph:+91 22 27481247
Website/OPAC best viewed in Mozilla Browser in 1366X768 Resolution.

Powered by Koha