| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
a |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20240527122609.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
240527b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Original cataloging agency |
AIKTC-KRRC |
| Transcribing agency |
AIKTC-KRRC |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| 9 (RLIN) |
23464 |
| Author |
Jonas, Mørkeberg Torry-Smith |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Challenges in designing mechatronic systems |
| 250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT |
|---|
| Volume, Issue number |
Vol.135(1), Jan |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. |
New York |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. |
ASME |
| Year |
2013 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Pagination |
1-11p. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
Development of mechatronic products is traditionally carried out by several design experts from different design domains. Performing development of mechatronic products is thus greatly challenging. In order to tackle this, the critical challenges in mechatronics have to be well understood and well supported through applicable methods and tools. This paper aims at identifying the major challenges, by conducting a systematic and thorough survey of the most relevant research work in mechatronic design. Solutions proposed in literature are assessed and illustrated through a case study in order to investigate if the challenges can be handled appropriately by the methods, tools, and mindsets suggested by the mechatronic community. Using a real-world mechatronics case, the paper identifies the areas where further research is required, by showing a clear connection between the actual problems faced during the design task and the nature of the solutions currently available. From the results obtained from this research, one can conclude that although various attempts have been developed to support conceptual design of mechatronics, these attempts are still not sufficient to help in assessing the consequences of selecting between alternative conceptual solutions across multiple domains. We believe that a common language is essential in developing mechatronics, and should be evaluated based on: its capability to represent the desired views effectively, its potential to be understood by engineers from the various domains, and its effect on the efficiency of the development process. |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| 9 (RLIN) |
4626 |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Mechanical Engineering |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| 9 (RLIN) |
23465 |
| Co-Author |
Ahsan Qamar |
| 773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Place, publisher, and date of publication |
New York ASME |
| Title |
Journal of mechanical design |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
|---|
| URL |
https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/mechanicaldesign/article-abstract/135/1/011005/375680/Challenges-in-Designing-Mechatronic-Systems?redirectedFrom=fulltext |
| Link text |
Click here |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
|
| Koha item type |
Articles Abstract Database |
