comparative seismic analysis and design using etabs and staad pro (Record no. 9620)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field a
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20191007141030.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 191007b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency AIKTC-KRRC
Transcribing agency AIKTC-KRRC
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
9 (RLIN) 9754
Author Suglo, Lamuo Francis
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title comparative seismic analysis and design using etabs and staad pro
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT
Volume, Issue number Vol.93(05), May
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Thane
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. ACC LTD
Year 2019
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Pagination 31-40p.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The paper presents how Extended Three dimensional Analysis of Building Systems (ETABS) software and Structural Analysis and Design Professional (STAAD Pro) each give steel reinforcement quantities against the provision of section 26.5 of Indian Standard (IS) 456:2000. It is factual that manually performing seismic analysis can be very tedious, timeconsuming and uncompetitive in an industry that is competition driven. In addition, the tendency of making errors due to the transposition of figures is high. Therefore, the need to adopt the computer and its program in the analysis and design of buildings and structures is overdue. However, it should not be at the expense of sustainability. The results of seismic analysis and design of a six storey (Ground floor plus five other floors referred to in this paper as G+5) building in ETABS software and STAAD Pro are used to examine how they both satisfy important provisions set out in the Indian Standard. Manual calculations were also done by following the provisions set out in IS 456:2000 and IS 1893 (Part I): 2016. The results shows ETABS gives much steel reinforcement in its output by 0.58% compared to STAAD Pro and 0.02% more than manually calculated result. In addition, the storey displacement, storey drift, base shear, moments and shear forces showed that there was an only marginal difference in the results from the ETABS and STAAD Pro analysis. ETABS analysis produced the highest values with a maximum difference of about 7% higher than results from the STAAD Pro analysis.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
9 (RLIN) 4621
Topical term or geographic name entry element Civil Engineering
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
9 (RLIN) 9755
Co-Author Malhotra, Monica
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Place, publisher, and date of publication Thane ACC Limited
Record control number icj
Title Indian Concrete Journal
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
URL https://www.icjonline.com/editionabstract_detail/052019
Link text Click here
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Koha item type Articles Abstract Database
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Shelving location Date acquired Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
          School of Engineering & Technology (PG) School of Engineering & Technology (PG) Archieval Section 2019-10-07 2019799 2019-10-07 2019-10-07 Articles Abstract Database
Unique Visitors hit counter Total Page Views free counter
Implemented and Maintained by AIKTC-KRRC (Central Library).
For any Suggestions/Query Contact to library or Email: librarian@aiktc.ac.in | Ph:+91 22 27481247
Website/OPAC best viewed in Mozilla Browser in 1366X768 Resolution.

Powered by Koha