Meaning of “near” and “far”: the impact of structuring design databases and the effect of distance of analogy on design output
By: Fu, Katherine
.
Contributor(s): Chan, Joel
.
Publisher: New York ASME 2013Edition: Vol.135(2), Feb.Description: 1-12p.Subject(s): Mechanical Engineering![](/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/images/filefind.png)
Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
School of Engineering & Technology Archieval Section | Not for loan | 2024-0649 |
This work lends insight into the meaning and impact of “near” and “far” analogies. A cognitive engineering design study is presented that examines the effect of the distance of analogical design stimuli on design solution generation, and places those findings in context of results from the literature. The work ultimately sheds new light on the impact of analogies in the design process and the significance of their distance from a design problem. In this work, the design repository from which analogical stimuli are chosen is the U.S. patent database, a natural choice, as it is one of the largest and easily accessed catalogued databases of inventions. The “near” and “far” analogical stimuli for this study were chosen based on a structure of patents, created using a combination of latent semantic analysis and a Bayesian based algorithm for discovering structural form, resulting in clusters of patents connected by their relative similarity. The findings of this engineering design study are juxtaposed with the findings of a previous study by the authors in design by analogy, which appear to be contradictory when viewed independently.
There are no comments for this item.