000			a
999			_c10402 _d10402
003			OSt
005			20191203142420.0
008			191203b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAIKTC-KRRC _cAIKTC-KRRC
100			_910942 _aHirpara, Ankit
245			_aAnalysis Of Time-Space Float For A Building Construction Project
250			_aVol.34(1), Jan-Mar
260			_aPune _bNICMAR _c2019
300			_a5-11p.
520			_aThe uniqueness of the project and high level of uncertainty associated with construction project makes its scheduling more challenging tasks resulting in the duration ofactivities overestimated. Hence Critical Chain Project Management Method (CCPM) acts as a handy tool to schedule the project with appropriate duration for each of the activities and providing various buffers to take into account various types ofuncertainties that may delay or create overrun for the activities. In conventional scheduling, space or location ofthe activity is not taken into account except in the case of techniques like Linear Scheduling Method (LSM), Line of Balance (LOB) method. The study is carried out to determine the project duration ofan ongoing project taking into account the actual duration ofactivities with constraints in resources and space available. The study compares the CCPM schedule taking into account the constraints in space with regular CCPM schedule and CPM schedule. The comparison shows that the duration of the project to complete with CCPM with space constraints, conventional CCPM, and CPM works out to 904 days, 854 days and 471 days respectively. On site verification ofthe project revealed that the project is expected to complete in 930 days, which is closer to CCPM with space constraints.
650		0	_94690 _aConstruction Engineering and Management (CEM)
700			_910943 _aCardoz, Hazel
773	0		_tNICMAR Journal of construction management _x0970-3675 _dPune National Institute of Construction Management and Research(NICMAR)
856			_uhttps://www.nicmar.ac.in/pdf/2019/01Jan-March-2019.pdf _yClick here
942			_2ddc _cAR