000			a
999			_c10704 _d10704
003			OSt
005			20191226144236.0
008			191226b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aAIKTC-KRRC _cAIKTC-KRRC
100			_99845 _aJain, A. K.
245			_aSpatial Planning for Clean Air
250			_aVol.16(3), Jul-Sep
260			_aMumbai _bInstitute of Town Planners _c2019
300			_a34-53p.
520			_aEnvironmental sustainability and improving quality of life are the two agendas that are said to be fulfilled by mixed land uses. However, given the current practices of mixed land uses, there are certain aspects of quality of life that are compromised to avail certain benefits. Parameters of quality of life that are affected by physical living environment are taken from literature and are firstly segregated into positively affected or negatively affected by mixed land uses based on experts opinion and literature. They are next rated by people on a 7 point Likert scale based on ‘How important they think each parameter is in determining their quality of life’. These ratings are compared with ratings by experts based on ‘How much they think the parameter is affected by mixed land uses’. T-test comparison of both the ratings gave an overview of whether benefits of mixed land uses match with people’s expectations from their living environment.
650		0	_94792 _aURBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN (AR-UPD)
773	0		_x0537-9679 _tITPI journal
856			_uhttp://www.itpi.org.in/uploads/journalfiles/Journal16%C3%973.pdf _yClick here
942			_2ddc _cAR