000 | a | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c16021 _d16021 |
||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20220122113400.0 | ||
008 | 220122b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aAIKTC-KRRC _cAIKTC-KRRC |
||
100 |
_915524 _aNagasai, T. |
||
245 | _aSesimic saffety assessment of symmetric and asymmetric building for different performance levels | ||
250 | _aVol.48(2), June-July | ||
260 |
_aChennai _bCSIR _c2021 |
||
300 | _a156-166p. | ||
520 | _aIn this paper, methodology for assessment of seismic safety in terms of margin ratios and conditional exceedance probabilities has been demonstrated for asymmetric and an asymmetric building for different performance levels viz. immediate Occupancy (IO), Life safety (LS) and collapse prevention (CP) in line with the procedure suggested in federal emergency management agency (FEMA) P695. Ground motions used in incremental dynamic analysis are chosen from pacific earthquake engineering research next generation attenuation models (PEER NGA) database,.... | ||
650 | 0 |
_94621 _aCivil Engineering |
|
700 |
_915528 _aKamatchi, P. |
||
773 | 0 |
_dChennai CSIR-Structural Engineering Research Centre _tJournal of structural engineering (JOSE) _x0970-0137 |
|
942 |
_2ddc _cAR |