000 | a | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c18182 _d18182 |
||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20221114121414.0 | ||
008 | 221114b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aAIKTC-KRRC _cAIKTC-KRRC |
||
100 |
_910812 _aHarish Kumar |
||
245 | _aGate all around MOSFET | ||
250 | _aVol.3(1), Jan-Jun | ||
260 |
_aJohannesburg _bAkiNik Publications _c2022 |
||
300 | _a18-23p. | ||
520 | _aTo keep performance levels high, we've scaled down single-gate MOSFETs to nanometres over the last three decades or so, but they're still plagued by issues such as interface coupling and channel orientation as well as leakage current and latch-up. In addition, additional parameters such as short channel effects (DIBL, GIDL), body effect, hot electron effect, punch through effect, surface scattering, impact ionisation, sub threshold swing, and volume inversion have shown results in terms of an increase in leakage current, a decrease in inversion charge, and a decrease in the drive current since the double-gate MOSFET came into existence. Comparing double- and single-gate MOSFET design, this article evaluated several performance parameters and channel material configurations for both configurations and also analysed different channel materials along with its structural orientation and the future uses of these devices. | ||
650 | 0 |
_94623 _aElectrical Engineering |
|
700 |
_919012 _aSingh, Shamsher |
||
773 | 0 |
_dJohannesburg AkiNik Publications _tInternational journal of advances in electrical engineering _x2708-4574 |
|
856 |
_uhttps://www.electricaltechjournal.com/article/16/3-1-3-624.pdf _yClick here |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cAR |