000 a
999 _c18546
_d18546
003 OSt
005 20221231142803.0
008 221231b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aAIKTC-KRRC
_cAIKTC-KRRC
100 _919515
_aGholami, Arash
245 _aEstimation of SPT N values from the results of DCPT counts after elimination of the soil friction effect
250 _aVol.52(6), Dec
260 _aUSA
_bSpringer
_c2022
300 _a1267-1277p.
520 _aThe dynamic cone penetration test (DCPT) measures the thickness and in situ strength of soil layers at shallow depths. The DCPT offers advantages such as low cost, portability, speed of operation and the ability to provide a continuous profile. Much research has been conducted by correlating the DCPT results with those of the standard penetration test (SPT). However, the diversity of the test tools used in such research has increased the complexity of choosing the proper equation for a given site. Skin friction can affect the test accuracy as well. The current research addresses both issues and develops a correlation between DCPT and SPT for fine cohesionless deposits. Several tests initially were performed using different cones and energy classes to obtain the optimal cone geometry. Next, the effect of soil failure around the test tools was evaluated by comparing the cone results and measuring the torque. After eliminating the test friction effect, the DCPT results were correlated with SPT N values at the same locations. The existing correlation formulas were transformed to the NSPT-qd form, where qd denotes the soil dynamic resistance and is independent of the level of energy applied. The proposed correlation was compared to existing correlations and showed better estimation of the SPT values, primarily because of its ability to select the proper cone geometry and eliminate the friction effect. Most correlations used less data than are required for the currently used equation, which is obtained from 76 data points in fine cohesionless silty and sandy soils.
650 0 _94621
_aCivil Engineering
700 _919516
_aPalassi, Massoud
773 0 _tIndian geotechnical journal
_x 0971-9555
_dSwitzerland Springer
856 _uhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40098-022-00604-4
_yClick here
942 _2ddc
_cAR