Comparison of polynomial cam profiles and input shaping for driving flexible systems (Record no. 21211)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | a |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20240626152016.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 240626b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
| Original cataloging agency | AIKTC-KRRC |
| Transcribing agency | AIKTC-KRRC |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| 9 (RLIN) | 23739 |
| Author | Pridgen, Brice |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Comparison of polynomial cam profiles and input shaping for driving flexible systems |
| 250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT | |
| Volume, Issue number | Vol.134(12), Dec |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | New York |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | ASME |
| Year | 2012 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Pagination | 1-7p. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Polynomial profiles can be used as reference commands to limit induced vibration in flexible systems. Due to their ease of design and low-pass filtering effects, polynomial profiles are often found in cam-follower systems. Polynomial profiles have also been used as smooth reference commands for automated machines. However, despite extensive work to develop and improve such profiles, inherent tradeoffs still exist between induced vibration, rise time, and ease of design. Input shaping is an alternative method for generating motion commands that reduce residual vibration. This paper compares polynomial profiles to input-shaped commands for the application of reducing vibration in flexible systems. Analyses using Laplace transforms reveal that input shapers suppress vibration at regularly spaced frequencies. However, polynomial profiles do not share this property. Simulations and experimental results show that input shaping improves rise time and reduces residual vibration in comparison to polynomial profiles. |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| 9 (RLIN) | 4626 |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | Mechanical Engineering |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| 9 (RLIN) | 23740 |
| Co-Author | Singhose, William |
| 773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | New York ASME |
| Title | Journal of mechanical design |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| URL | https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/mechanicaldesign/article-abstract/134/12/124505/375706/Comparison-of-Polynomial-Cam-Profiles-and-Input?redirectedFrom=fulltext |
| Link text | Click here |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
| Koha item type | Articles Abstract Database |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | School of Engineering & Technology | School of Engineering & Technology | Archieval Section | 26/06/2024 | 2024-0771 | 26/06/2024 | 26/06/2024 | Articles Abstract Database |