Objective
:
The study was conducted to analyze the rationality of treatment regimens and thrombosis prophylaxis used in coronary artery
intervention to compare to guidelines for treatment according to VNHA and recommendation of ACC/AHA at Interventional cardiol
ogy in
Can Tho
Central General Hospital.
Method
s:
The cross
-sectional study was based on the data collected from entire medical records of patients at Interventional cardiology in Can T
ho
Central General Hospital from August 2017 to February 2018. The rationality
of the antithrombotic regimen used at the Hospital is assessed
through criteria such as medical combination, dosage, time to take medicine, clinical trials during the treatment.
Result
s:
The study found that 95.6% and 90.7% were suitable for medical combi
nation before and after PC
I; 100% fit for
the
use of medicin
e;
and
100% was suitable for
antithrombotic agents
and clinical trials during treatment tim
e;
in terms of dosage, the result showed that entrance and
maintenance were 84.9% and 100% for aspirin re
spectivel
y;
71.7% and 100% for clopidogre
l;
100% and 94.7% for ticagrelo
r;
90.2
-92.8% and
98.1% for enoxapari
n;
especially, heparin
-100% anticoagulant was appropriate to recommend.
Conclusio
n:
The study showed that treatment regimens and thrombosis prophylaxis in percutaneous coronary intervention at Interventional
cardiology in Can Tho Central General Hospital were quite suitable compared to the recommendations of the Heart Association. The res
ults from the
study are a scientific basis for the Hospital to maintain or consider adjustments to improve the quality of treatment, ensure
the effectiveness and
safety of patients
.