IMPACT OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEAS E: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL COHORT STUDY
Publication details: M P Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd 2019Edition: Vol.11(12)Description: 10-15pSubject(s): Online resources: In: International journal of pharmacy and pharmaceutical scienceSummary: Objective: Hypertension (HTN) is both a cause and an effect of chronic kidney disease (CKD). To adequately control blood pressure (BP) i n CKD, choosing antihypertensive strategies with the highest nephro -protective effect is crucial for preventing or rever sing end -stage renal disease (ESRD) progression and reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The present study was therefore designed to evaluate the impact o f clinical use of antihypertensive drug therapy in patients with CKD and ESRD. Method s: It is a prospective observational cohort study. The patients were divided into two cohorts i.e.; non- dialysis dependent (NDD) and dialysis - dependent (DD) CKD. This study was conducted for six months in the Nephrology department, Osmania General Hospital , H yderabad, India. The data collected and entered into Microsoft Excel (2007) and mean, SD and range were cal culated using SPSS version 25. Result s: Antihypertensive drugs were prescribed alone or in combination based on the co -morbidities associated with CKD and HTN. Loop diuretics (Furosemide and Torsemide) and calcium channel blocker (Amlodipine, Nifedipine and Cilnidipine) were most commonly prescribed antihypertensive drugs. Triple therapy (44.11%) was prescribed mostly in both the cohorts (NDD = 16.66 % +DD = 27.45%) of which calcium channel blockers +loop diuretic +sympatholytic accounts for 19.16% (NDD = 5.88% +DD = 13.73%). Conclusio n: The practice of prescribing antihypertensive drugs for the management of HTN and to achieve BP targets in CKD and ESRD remains uncertain. The development of new and revised guidelines is needed to reduce inappropriate variations in practice and promote better del ivery of evidence -based treatment.| Item type | Current library | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|  Articles Abstract Database | School of Pharmacy Archieval Section | Not for loan | 2020965 | 
                                                    
                                                        Objective: 
Hypertension  (HTN)  is  both  a  cause  and  an  effect  of  chronic  kidney  disease  (CKD).  To  adequately  control  blood  pressure  (BP)  i
n  CKD,  
choosing antihypertensive strategies with the highest nephro
-protective effect is crucial for preventing or rever
sing end
-stage renal disease (ESRD) 
progression  and  reducing  cardiovascular  disease  (CVD)  risk.  The  present  study  was  therefore  designed  to  evaluate  the  impact  o
f  clinical  use  of  
antihypertensive drug therapy in patients with CKD and ESRD.
Method
s: 
It is a prospective observational cohort study. The patients were divided into two cohorts i.e.; non-
dialysis dependent (NDD) and dialysis
-
dependent  (DD)  CKD.  This  study  was  conducted  for  six  months  in  the  Nephrology 
department, 
Osmania  General  Hospital
,  H
yderabad,  India.  The  
data collected and entered into Microsoft Excel (2007) and mean, SD and range were cal
culated using SPSS version 25.
Result
s: 
Antihypertensive drugs were prescribed alone or in combination based on the co
-morbidities associated with CKD and HTN. Loop diuretics 
(Furosemide   and   Torsemide)   and   calcium   channel   blocker   (Amlodipine,   Nifedipine   and   Cilnidipine)   were   most   commonly   prescribed
antihypertensive  drugs.  Triple  therapy  (44.11%)  was  prescribed  mostly  in  both  the  cohorts  (NDD  =  16.66
%
+DD  =  27.45%)  of  which  calcium  
channel blockers
+loop diuretic
+sympatholytic accounts for 19.16% (NDD = 5.88%
+DD = 13.73%).
Conclusio
n: 
The  practice  of  prescribing  antihypertensive  drugs  for  the  management  of  HTN  and  to 
achieve  BP  targets  in  CKD  and  ESRD  remains 
uncertain.
 The development of new and revised guidelines is needed to reduce inappropriate variations in practice and promote better del
ivery of 
evidence
-based treatment.
                                                    
                                                
There are no comments on this title.
