Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from Google Jackets

Drying of Fruits and Vegetables in a Developed Multimode Drying Unit and Comparison with Commercially Available Systems

By: Contributor(s): Publication details: New York Springer 2019Edition: Vol.100(3), SepDescription: 381-386pSubject(s): Online resources: In: Journal of the institution of engineers (India): Series ASummary: A multimode fruits and vegetables drying unit and laboratory dryer were used for drying of different fruits and vegetables, i.e., red onion, Indian gooseberry, papaya, carrot and sweet potato. Drying time, color, antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of the dried fruits and vegetables for vacuum and hot air drying mode were compared for adjudging the performance. The drying time was observed in increasing order as NiftEMA-DU (vacuum drying, i.e., VD), NiftEMA-DU (hot air drying, i.e., HAD), laboratory dryer (HAD) and laboratory dryer (VD). Differences in lightness, redness and yellowness were found a little when compared for both of the drying systems. It was found that differences in retention of antioxidant and total phenolic compound of red onion, Indian gooseberry, papaya and carrot were not high in NiftEMA-DU (VD) and laboratory vacuum dryer. But, in HAD process, retention was higher in all the samples using NiftEMA-DU (HAD). In case of sweet potato, neither dryer type nor drying mode affected the quality properties even though drying time was observed on higher side in laboratory dryers.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Status Barcode
Articles Abstract Database Articles Abstract Database School of Engineering & Technology Archieval Section Not for loan 2020412
Total holds: 0

A multimode fruits and vegetables drying unit and laboratory dryer were used for drying of different fruits and vegetables, i.e., red onion, Indian gooseberry, papaya, carrot and sweet potato. Drying time, color, antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of the dried fruits and vegetables for vacuum and hot air drying mode were compared for adjudging the performance. The drying time was observed in increasing order as NiftEMA-DU (vacuum drying, i.e., VD), NiftEMA-DU (hot air drying, i.e., HAD), laboratory dryer (HAD) and laboratory dryer (VD). Differences in lightness, redness and yellowness were found a little when compared for both of the drying systems. It was found that differences in retention of antioxidant and total phenolic compound of red onion, Indian gooseberry, papaya and carrot were not high in NiftEMA-DU (VD) and laboratory vacuum dryer. But, in HAD process, retention was higher in all the samples using NiftEMA-DU (HAD). In case of sweet potato, neither dryer type nor drying mode affected the quality properties even though drying time was observed on higher side in laboratory dryers.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image
Share
Unique Visitors hit counter Total Page Views free counter
Implemented and Maintained by AIKTC-KRRC (Central Library).
For any Suggestions/Query Contact to library or Email: librarian@aiktc.ac.in | Ph:+91 22 27481247
Website/OPAC best viewed in Mozilla Browser in 1366X768 Resolution.