| 000 | a | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c19575 _d19575 |
||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20230628163406.0 | ||
| 008 | 230628b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aAIKTC-KRRC _cAIKTC-KRRC |
||
| 100 |
_921283 _aVivekananand, N. |
||
| 245 | _a COMPARISON OF EXTREME RAINFALL ESTIMATES USING L-MOMENTS OF SIX PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS | ||
| 250 | _aVol,41(2), Apr | ||
| 260 |
_aRoorkee _bIndian Water Resources Society _c2021 |
||
| 300 | _a35-40p | ||
| 520 | _aEstimation of rainfall for a given return period is utmost importance for planning, design and management of hydraulic structures. This can be achieved through Extreme Value Analysis (EVA) by fitting probability distributions (PDs) to the series of annual 1-day maximum rainfall data. In this paper, a study on comparison of extreme rainfall estimates using L-Moments (LMO) of six PDs such as Exponential, Extreme Value Type-1, Extreme Value Type-2, Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), Generalized Pareto and Log-Normal for Afzalpur and Kalaburagi sites is carried out. The adequacy of fitting six PDs adopted in EVA of rainfall is quantitatively assessed by applying the Goodness-of-Fit (GoF) (viz., Chi-square and Kolmogorov-Smirnov) and diagnostic (viz., D-index) tests, and qualitatively assessed by using the probability plots of the estimated rainfall. The EVA results of rainfall indicate the GEV (using LMO) is better suited amongst six PDs adopted for estimation of rainfall at Afzalpur and Kalaburagi sites | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_94621 _aCivil Engineering |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_x0970-6984 _tJournal of indian water resource society _dRoorkee Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee |
|
| 856 |
_uhttps://iwrs.org.in/journal/apr2021/6apr.pdf _yClick here |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cAR |
||